Devin Coldewey is a Seattle-based writer and photographer. He wrote for the TechCrunch network since 2007. Some posts, it would like you to read: the perils of externalization of knowledge | Generation I | Surveillant society | Select two | Frame war | User manifesto | Our great sin his personal site — coldewey. cc. ? Read More
If you've read the Internet regularly this week, you're probably familiar with Jonathan maps, "social experiment" is tantamount to public Starbucks gift card. Perhaps you have bought a coffee with him. You could have it. You could have suspected him of Starbucks, viral (is not).
What you probably don't have a script pull money from the card in order to use it for their own nefarious purposes. And "dastardly purposes", I mean feeding hungry children in Africa. Here comes the ethics!
Sam Odio, who sold Divvyshot Facebook last year and is currently working on launches Freshplum, regardless of the detail in the hack, he put together that undermines rather Jonathan maps philosophy. Uninspired certainly uninspiring parcels "yuppies, buying coffee yuppies", he created a script which checks the card balance and warns him whenever it hits a certain amount. He then puts the money of his own cards. Just today he "earned" $ 625.
At first I thought it was just incredibly Jack step Odio. Odious, if you will. But I'm also less than Amused with the card (bloggers and entrepreneurs by buying bad coffee) than with the idea, which is obvious, of course. And of course we run Conference (now coming to Beijing!) called Disrupt and Hackathon, where is the exact behavior is encouraged. It's just not always enough so is impertinent.
But the reason even to condemn? This is an experiment in social media, in the end. Pass the plate around with dollar and you can get the plate with one hundred — or some else can save you from counting your money. The idea of a public, unsecured transfer device used throughout the country, their own objectives, and the subversion model just part of the process. Now, when I had time to think about it, I think, Odio in response (turn it down), exactly correct, and I'm glad to see money going to a good cause (it's actually $ 10 higher than its face value on eBay).
In addition, an original experiment continues — it will not be a big part of the experiment, if he hadn't made his results. But how do you feel those who donated? Probably deceived — but it's not very rational, is it? They put their money on a plate. They don't buy the plate. They will continue to donate? Will people clone script and race to the bottom, transmit their own balances a penny? I would say this experiment just got much more interesting.
Update: Unfortunately, Starbucks close map down almost the moment I wrote that. So this experiment just got a lot more over. Well it would be interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment